edelweissmf image

Balanced Advantage Fund vs Aggressive Hybrid Fund - Which Is Better?

    

Did you know that the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) classifies mutual funds into three broad categories - equity, debt, and hybrid funds? Within the hybrid category, SEBI further divides them into seven sub-categories - Conservative Hybrid Fund, Balanced Hybrid Fund, Aggressive Hybrid Fund, Dynamic Asset Allocation or Balanced Advantage Fund, Multi Asset Allocation Fund, Arbitrage Fund, and Equity Savings Fund. In this article, let’s focus on two of these - Balanced Advantage Funds and Aggressive Hybrid Funds. So that in the debate between Balanced Advantage Fund vs Aggressive Hybrid Fund, you can confidently select one that suits you the best!

What is a Balanced Advantage Fund?

A Balanced Advantage Fund is a type of hybrid mutual fund that invests in both equity and debt instruments. There are no asset allocation limits for balanced advantage fund , e.g. the un-hedged equity exposure of a balanced fund may be lower than 65%, These funds can invest 50% in equity and equity-related instruments, and  50% in debt instruments, depending on market conditions generally in leading moment exposure in equity to debt proportion can be in 80:20 ratio, while during market correction it can bought back to 40:60 ration but there is no specific asset allocation limit is prescribed. Based on market condition  fund house invests in a proportion to equity / debt that is managed dynamically, so that exposure in the fund can remain balanced and they can provide higher flexibility

When markets are performing well, the fund typically increases its exposure to equities. And, when the situation reverses, it shifts more towards debt to reduce risk. This dynamic investment strategy is also the reason why Balanced Advantage Funds are often referred to as Dynamic Asset Allocation Funds.

What is an Aggressive Hybrid Fund?

An Aggressive Hybrid Fund typically invests 65% to 80% of its money in equity and equity-related instruments, and the remaining 20% to 35% of its funds in debt instruments. Unlike Balanced Advantage Funds, which can shift dynamically between equity and debt, Aggressive Hybrid Funds always maintain a large portion  as equity exposure. They do not completely move to debt. This may result in a higher potential for growth but also greater risk. 

Aggressive Hybrid vs Balanced Advantage funds - What are the differences?

  • Asset Allocation

Balanced Advantage Funds offer fund managers the flexibility to shift between equity and debt depending on market conditions. There are no asset allocation limits for balanced advantage fund, it is depends on fund manager and market condition. .

Aggressive Hybrid Funds, in contrast, follow a more structured approach. These funds are required to maintain a minimum of 65% and a maximum of 80% exposure to equity. At the same time, they must hold at least 20% and not more than 35% in debt instruments. So, unlike Balanced Advantage Funds, they cannot shift entirely out of equity or debt.

  • Taxation

The taxation of mutual funds depends on whether a scheme qualifies as an equity or non-equity fund. A fund is considered equity-oriented for tax purposes if it maintains at least 65% of its assets in equity and equity-related instruments. Aggressive Hybrid Funds by regulation have to maintain the equity exposure between 65%-80% and hence taxed as equity funds, as per prevailing tax laws.

Balanced Advantage Funds do not maintain a pre-determined equity or debt structure and hence will be taxed as per the prevailing tax laws, depending on the equity or debt asset allocation in the portfolio.

How do you choose?

Here are some things that you can evaluate when selecting between the two:

  • Fund manager experience

When deciding between an Aggressive Hybrid Fund and a Balanced Advantage Fund, one important factor to consider is the experience of the fund manager. Both fund types require a skilled and experienced manager. However, Balanced Advantage Funds allow the fund manager to move entirely into equity or entirely into debt, depending on market conditions. This may demand a high level of expertise as well as sound judgment and the ability to make timely strategic calls.

Aggressive Hybrid Funds also need an experienced hand. However, they follow a more defined asset allocation structure. The manager operates within a set framework. So, they have a fixed template to follow.

  • Risk

Risk levels can differ between the two depending on the actual allocation at any given time. However, since both are hybrid funds, they typically carry a moderately high risk profile.

  • Taxation

Balanced Advantage Funds may shift between equity and debt taxation based on their asset mix, while Aggressive Hybrid Funds are always taxed as equity. It may help to review your current portfolio to assess whether you need more equity or debt exposure from a tax diversification perspective before choosing between the two.

Conclusion        

While both funds fall under the hybrid category, they differ in how they manage asset allocation and taxation. Understanding these differences can help you make a decision. And before you take a call, look at your financial goals and review your existing investment portfolio. This can help you determine which fund aligns better with your needs.


MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO MARKET RISKS. READ ALL SCHEME RELATED DOCUMENTS CAREFULLY




Signup for our Newsletter

MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO MARKET RISKS, READ ALL SCHEME RELATED DOCUMENTS CAREFULLY.